<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:ymaps="http://api.maps.yahoo.com/Maps/V2/AnnotatedMaps.xsd"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Oblivious in Olathe</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kansascyclist.com/news/2010/05/oblivious-in-olathe/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kansascyclist.com/news/2010/05/oblivious-in-olathe/</link>
	<description>The web&#039;s premier site for bicycling in the state of Kansas.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 15:58:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy</title>
		<link>http://www.kansascyclist.com/news/2010/05/oblivious-in-olathe/#comment-327</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 May 2010 16:32:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kansascyclist.com/news/?p=3847#comment-327</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think those number are unrealistic at all. Hundreds is certainly within reason -- OK, not &lt;i&gt;every&lt;/i&gt; day, but definitely most days. There may not be that many riding to work, but if you count recreational cyclists, kids going to/from school, kids riding their bikes in the street, families out for rides, I think that&#039;s absolutely hundreds per day.

And Olathe is a rather large geographic area -- 54 square miles -- surely there are two people per square mile riding bicycles on Olathe streets some time during each day.

&quot;Thousands&quot; is not at all out of the realm of possibility on weekends with nice weather.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think those number are unrealistic at all. Hundreds is certainly within reason &#8212; OK, not <i>every</i> day, but definitely most days. There may not be that many riding to work, but if you count recreational cyclists, kids going to/from school, kids riding their bikes in the street, families out for rides, I think that&#8217;s absolutely hundreds per day.</p>
<p>And Olathe is a rather large geographic area &#8212; 54 square miles &#8212; surely there are two people per square mile riding bicycles on Olathe streets some time during each day.</p>
<p>&#8220;Thousands&#8221; is not at all out of the realm of possibility on weekends with nice weather.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.kansascyclist.com/news/2010/05/oblivious-in-olathe/#comment-326</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 May 2010 13:21:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kansascyclist.com/news/?p=3847#comment-326</guid>
		<description>I absolutely agree with the idea of contacting Mr. Bacon to let him know of cyclists&#039; concerns. I love Olathe&#039;s bike lanes and would love to see more, especially on Santa Fe.

That said, we cyclists should avoid hyperbole. There&#039;s no way that &quot;hundreds&quot; of cyclists use Olathe streets each day. And certainly nowhere near &quot;thousands.&quot; If we keep throwing unrealistic numbers like that out there, the politicians (and the public) won&#039;t take us seriously.

Perhaps if bike lanes become more prevalent, those numbers will someday become the norm. I certainly hope so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I absolutely agree with the idea of contacting Mr. Bacon to let him know of cyclists&#8217; concerns. I love Olathe&#8217;s bike lanes and would love to see more, especially on Santa Fe.</p>
<p>That said, we cyclists should avoid hyperbole. There&#8217;s no way that &#8220;hundreds&#8221; of cyclists use Olathe streets each day. And certainly nowhere near &#8220;thousands.&#8221; If we keep throwing unrealistic numbers like that out there, the politicians (and the public) won&#8217;t take us seriously.</p>
<p>Perhaps if bike lanes become more prevalent, those numbers will someday become the norm. I certainly hope so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Burns</title>
		<link>http://www.kansascyclist.com/news/2010/05/oblivious-in-olathe/#comment-325</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Burns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 May 2010 01:32:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kansascyclist.com/news/?p=3847#comment-325</guid>
		<description>John Bacon needs to be toast next election time.  I&#039;ve heard this dumkopf make ignorant statements like this live and in person during previous city council meetings addressing development in the city.  He wouldn&#039;t see folks riding to work in Olathe if he had toothpix propping his eyes open.  He is Olathe&#039;s past; it just remains for the electorate to make sure of it next go round.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John Bacon needs to be toast next election time.  I&#8217;ve heard this dumkopf make ignorant statements like this live and in person during previous city council meetings addressing development in the city.  He wouldn&#8217;t see folks riding to work in Olathe if he had toothpix propping his eyes open.  He is Olathe&#8217;s past; it just remains for the electorate to make sure of it next go round.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith Gates</title>
		<link>http://www.kansascyclist.com/news/2010/05/oblivious-in-olathe/#comment-324</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Gates</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 May 2010 00:43:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kansascyclist.com/news/?p=3847#comment-324</guid>
		<description>In the shortest way possible to describe my thoughts on this matter:  Unacceptable viewpoint.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the shortest way possible to describe my thoughts on this matter:  Unacceptable viewpoint.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

